Individual report
A personal document for an assessment participant. It explains the result, strength of evidence, and concrete recommendations for further work with AI.
The individual report is a document for the person who completed the assessment. It belongs to the participant and should help them understand how they work with AI today, what already works, and what is worth trying next.
It is not a school report. It is not a psychological profile. It is a working snapshot of current practice.
#What you will find in the report
The report keeps the same order so it can be read quickly even without knowing the methodology.
| Section | What it explains |
|---|---|
| Your level | How much AI is part of your work |
| Your AI work style | Whether you most often look for opportunities, analyze, create, or build systems with AI |
| Next step | What is most likely to move you forward now |
| SP Score | A baseline numeric measure inside your level |
| Recommendations | 3 to 5 concrete steps for your role |
Each section should make sense on its own. A person should not need a methodology dictionary to understand what the report says.
#Your level
The first part shows where you stand today in your work with AI. We work with four levels:
- AI Explorer: you are trying AI and looking for the first stable use.
- L1 Operator: you already use AI regularly in your work.
- L2 Builder: you build personal workflows, templates, assistants, or tools.
- L3 Transformer: AI changed how you do an important part of your work.
The report always explains why the result comes out this way. Not only "you are L2", but "what in the answers and examples points to L2 and what would still need to be visible for L3".
#Your AI work style
The second part describes where you most often create value with AI.
Some people mainly use AI to find new opportunities. Some analyze and decide. Some create texts, presentations, or prototypes. Some build repeatable workflows and systems.
In the report, we use this as a working compass, not an identity. We do not say "you are a Creation type". We say something closer to: "Your work with AI currently shows the strongest signal in creating concrete outputs."
#Next step
This part is often the most important one. It shows what will move you forward now.
The next step is not a weakness. It is the direction where your current practice can improve the fastest. If you can already create outputs quickly, the next step may be turning them into a repeatable workflow. If you analyze well, the next step may be turning analysis into a concrete output.
A good recommendation should help someone say: "I can try this next week."
#SP Score
SP Score is a baseline numeric measure. We do not read it as a grade and do not use it by itself without context.
Your level matters most. The score only shows where you are inside that level: at the beginning, in the middle, or close to the next boundary. It is most valuable in repeated measurement, because it can show progress even when the level itself has not changed yet.
#Recommendations
At the end of the report there are 3 to 5 recommendations. Each should be concrete:
- what to do,
- why this step,
- how to start,
- how to know whether it works.
We do not want generic advice such as "use AI more". A recommendation should lead to one action a person can try in their own work.
#How we work with confidence
Not every result has the same strength of evidence. Some people bring concrete examples, repeatable workflows, and clear outputs. For others, we have only a short questionnaire and more general answers.
That is why the report adjusts its language based on confidence:
- Strong evidence: "Your strongest area is..."
- Medium evidence: "So far it looks like..."
- Weaker evidence: "The first signals point to..."
When we have little data, we do not pretend to be certain. That is an important part of the methodology.
The individual report does not assess personality, compare you with specific colleagues, or serve as a basis for performance evaluation. It only describes current work with AI.
#What to do with the report next
The simplest next step is to choose one recommendation and try it in the nearest working week. If you continue into coaching, the report becomes the starting map: where to begin, what to watch, and when to adjust the recommendation based on reality.